Wagtail vs. Drupal: A comparative guide for Content Management Systems

We are WAAT Ltd., specialising in open-source technologies. Our experienced Drupal and Wagtail developers provide hosting, maintenance, web development, design, and UX, creating secure, robust, and high-performing websites tailored to client needs. With 15+ years of experience and over 140 successful web systems delivered, we’ve served clients such as the European Commission, the World Health Organization, Audi, the Socialists and Democrats, and SMEs.
If you’re looking for a company to help with your Wagtail CMS or Drupal CMS project, feel free to contact us.
KEY CONTACT:
Maciej Krysciak, PhD
Managing Partner & Technical Project Manager
maciek@waat.eu

Choosing the right Content Management System (CMS) is a strategic decision that can significantly impact your organisation’s digital presence and operational efficiency. With numerous options available, two platforms often stand out: Wagtail CMS and Drupal. Each offers distinct advantages and challenges, but how do they truly compare in practical scenarios? This guide aims to provide a clear, comparative analysis of Wagtail and Drupal, focusing on their architectural foundations, user experience, security, and performance capabilities.

While Wagtail really showcases the robustness of the Django framework to offer a streamlined, developer-friendly environment, Drupal presents a highly modular, PHP-based architecture that is great at customisation and scalability. But what does this mean for your daily operations? How do these systems handle high traffic, and what are their security protocols? By examining these aspects, this guide will help you with the knowledge to make an informed decision tailored to your organisation’s specific needs.

Understanding the architectural foundations and flexibility of Wagtail and Drupal

Wagtail’s Django-based structure

Wagtail, leveraging the robust Django framework, offers a developer-friendly environment that enhances both security and scalability. Known for its “batteries-included” approach, Django provides built-in solutions that streamline development challenges, allowing Wagtail to offer a highly customisable CMS tailored efficiently to specific project requirements. An experienced Wagtail developer can take full advantage of Django’s flexibility, creating scalable and secure systems while easily adapting functionalities to meet evolving project needs.

Drupal’s modular approach

Drupal’s PHP-based, highly modular architecture excels in providing extensive customisation through its vast array of modules and themes. While this allows for tailored solutions, it can also introduce complexity in system management and upgrades. Drupal’s design is adept at handling complex, content-heavy websites and offers scalability to accommodate large traffic volumes and content loads.

Flexibility in customisation

Both CMSs boast significant customisation capabilities:

• Wagtail utilises Django’s “app” structure, enabling easy scaling and customisation by adding or modifying functionalities with minimal disruption.
• Drupal offers a wide range of modules for functionality extension, though this can lead to potential module conflicts and dependency issues.

The choice often hinges on the preferred development environment (Python vs. PHP) and the project’s specific needs concerning traffic and content management complexity. Wagtail may be ideal for smaller teams with strong Python expertise, while Drupal can be a better fit for more complex projects requiring diverse integrations and expansive customisation options.

Enhancing user experience and content management

Ease of use for content creators

Wagtail is a breath of fresh air with its intuitive interface, simplifying the content creation process. Its admin interface is designed to be straightforward, focusing on the needs of content creators, making it a preferred choice for those seeking an easy-to-use CMS.

In contrast, Drupal offers powerful capabilities suited for detailed content management workflows but with a steeper learning curve. This makes it potentially overwhelming for new users but invaluable for managing complex sites. Whilst Wagtail’s simplicity appeals to smaller teams, Drupal’s vast flexibility can make it a better fit for enterprise-level operations requiring intricate content structures.

Custom content types and flexibility

Both CMSs support custom content types, albeit differently:

• Wagtail uses Django models for defining new content types, a method that is efficient but would require an experienced team of Wagtail developers.
• Drupal allows site builders to create content types through its UI, a more accessible approach for non-developers but potentially less optimised for performance.

For non-technical users, Drupal offers more accessible customisation options, but Wagtail’s developer-first approach can provide a cleaner, more efficient content management system for technical teams.

Workflow and collaboration features

Whilst Drupal has traditionally offered more comprehensive tools for content management workflows, Wagtail is rapidly incorporating more features to enhance team collaboration and content management, making it increasingly competitive in this area. However, Drupal’s built-in workflow management and role-based permissions system still make it a preferred choice for organisations with complex approval processes.

Prioritising security and reliability

Core security features

Security is paramount, and Wagtail benefits from Django’s robust security features, protecting against common attacks like SQL injection and CSRF. Drupal, while secure, has faced high-profile vulnerabilities but benefits from a quick-responding, extensive community that addresses these issues promptly. Both platforms have strong security protocols, but Drupal’s larger community and track record may offer an edge for organisations with higher security concerns.

Community support and updates

Both CMSs boast active communities. The community, though smaller, is highly engaged and responsive, often allowing quicker vulnerability responses. Drupal’s large and established community contributes extensively to its security and maintenance. This extensive ecosystem ensures frequent updates and patches, making Drupal particularly attractive for enterprises requiring ongoing support.

Assessing performance and scalability

Handling high traffic

Both CMSs are equipped to manage high traffic:

• Wagtail provides out-of-the-box efficiency with Django’s design and caching mechanisms.
• Drupal requires more optimisation, particularly at the database level, to manage large traffic volumes effectively.

Drupal’s modularity can add complexity to scaling, whilst Wagtail’s simplicity in architecture allows for smoother scalability, especially for teams familiar with Django’s framework.

Scalability solutions

Scalability is crucial for growth, and both CMSs offer robust solutions:

• Wagtail scales effortlessly using Django’s tools and a straightforward deployment process.
• Drupal supports scalable database options and a robust caching API, suitable for websites with extensive daily visits.

However, if your website demands complex integrations, multilingual support, or expansive functionality, Drupal’s rich ecosystem may provide more extensive options for growth.

Conclusion: Wagtail vs. Drupal - strategic insights for optimal CMS selection

When deciding between Wagtail and Drupal for your content management needs, it’s essential to weigh their distinct architectural advantages, user experience designs, security protocols, and scalability capabilities. Wagtail, with its Django-based framework, offers a developer-centric, streamlined environment that excels in security and ease of customisation. Conversely, Drupal’s PHP-based, modular structure shines in handling complex, content-heavy sites with its extensive customisation options, though it may present a steeper learning curve and require more intensive management.

Both platforms are equipped to support high-traffic scenarios, with Wagtail providing out-of-the-box efficiency and Drupal offering powerful scalability through extensive optimisation. The choice ultimately depends on your organisation’s specific requirements, technical resources, and long-term digital strategy goals. While Wagtail may be ideal for projects requiring streamlined development and simpler content management, Drupal offers unparalleled flexibility and scalability for more intricate and complex websites.

Here are examples of two very different projects we have developed on both platforms. For Wagtail there is Climate Action Tracker, an independent scientific project that tracks government climate action and measures it against the globally agreed Paris Agreement. And for Drupal, the website for the Socialists & Democrats Group, the leading centre-left political group in the European Parliament.

As you consider this decision, remember that selecting a CMS shapes the future of your digital operations and guides your organisation’s digital growth. This decision reflects a strategic commitment to enhancing operational efficiency and not merely a technological choice.